ጠጥቶ ፈረስ መንዳት


ጠጥቶ መንዳት ክልክል ነው፡፡ ይህን ህግ ጠጥተው የማውቁ ሆነ ነድተው የማውቁ ሁሉ ያውቁታል፡፡ ግን ምን መንዳት ነው የተከለከለው? ለምሳሌ የሚነዳው መኪና መሆኑ ቀርቶ ፈረስ ቢሆንስ? በአሜሪካ ፔንስላቫኒያ ግዛት ፍርድ ቤት በቀረበ ጉዳይ ላይ ይኸው ነጥብ ሁሉንም ዳኞች ባያስማማም ፈረስም፤ መኪናም ያው ነው የሚል አቋም ተይዞ ፍርድ ተሰጥቷል፡፡ (Pennsylvania v. Noel, 857 A.2d 1283 (Pa. 2004) (Eakin, J., dissenting). ) ፍርዱ የተሰጠው እንደሚከተለው በግጥም ነበር፡፡

A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
but the Vehicle Code does not divorce
its application from, perforce,
a steed, as my colleagues said.
“It’s not vague” I’ll say until I’m hoarse,
and whether a car, a truck or horse
this law applies with equal force,
and I’d reverse instead.

About these ads

3 thoughts on “ጠጥቶ ፈረስ መንዳት

    1. zeleke

      I want to suggest on the labor proclamation specially article 36,37,38 the courts has misunderstood the intention of the the law. when they give their decision they decreed on the employer to pay the employee 3 month salary. they didn’t evaluate by witness the cases.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s