ጠጥቶ ፈረስ መንዳት


ጠጥቶ መንዳት ክልክል ነው፡፡ ይህን ህግ ጠጥተው የማውቁ ሆነ ነድተው የማውቁ ሁሉ ያውቁታል፡፡ ግን ምን መንዳት ነው የተከለከለው? ለምሳሌ የሚነዳው መኪና መሆኑ ቀርቶ ፈረስ ቢሆንስ? በአሜሪካ ፔንስላቫኒያ ግዛት ፍርድ ቤት በቀረበ ጉዳይ ላይ ይኸው ነጥብ ሁሉንም ዳኞች ባያስማማም ፈረስም፤ መኪናም ያው ነው የሚል አቋም ተይዞ ፍርድ ተሰጥቷል፡፡ (Pennsylvania v. Noel, 857 A.2d 1283 (Pa. 2004) (Eakin, J., dissenting). ) ፍርዱ የተሰጠው እንደሚከተለው በግጥም ነበር፡፡

A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
but the Vehicle Code does not divorce
its application from, perforce,
a steed, as my colleagues said.
“It’s not vague” I’ll say until I’m hoarse,
and whether a car, a truck or horse
this law applies with equal force,
and I’d reverse instead.

4 thoughts on “ጠጥቶ ፈረስ መንዳት

  1. Miss understanding of proclamation number 377/96 Article 36, 37 and 38 by the courts in relation with late payments are as soon as the employment contracts of the worker is terminated the company gives/pay monthly salary if any, unused annual leave if any, and overtime payment if any, to the worker within seven working days /7/from the date of termination .This needs investigation of witness and documentary evidence before giving decision based on article 36&38 of proclamation no 377/96. Even if the employer attached the documentary evidence with statement of defence showing that the above mentioned payments are effected to the employee, courts gives decision of three/3 / month salary to the worker by said payments are late ,which is against article 37 of the proclamation. And as the same time courts while giving decision concerning late payment , they didn’t mention which payments are late and by whom reason payments are late. So , the courts should have to examine and identify which payments are late , by whom reason payments are late and as the same time has to examine the documentary evidence showing payment attached with statement of defence.

    1. I want to suggest on the labor proclamation specially article 36,37,38 the courts has misunderstood the intention of the the law. when they give their decision they decreed on the employer to pay the employee 3 month salary. they didn’t evaluate by witness the cases.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s